Skip to content

Resources

Clear thinking for a fast-moving issue

Short, practical writing for leaders, educators, parents, and students. Articles are in preparation and will be published here as they are ready.

Biblical worldview and AI

How Scripture shapes the questions a Christian community asks about artificial intelligence, beginning with the image of God.

  • What a biblical worldview says about artificial intelligenceComing soon
  • Human dignity and the limits of machine outputComing soon
  • Testing claims: discernment in an age of fluent answersComing soon

Teaching, learning, and academic integrity

Practical guidance for educators on assessment, authorship, and protecting the thinking students need to do.

  • Designing assignments that still measure learningComing soon
  • Disclosure language teachers and students can shareComing soon
  • Where AI genuinely helps a teacher prepareComing soon

Family safety, privacy, and healthy use

Age-appropriate boundaries, personal information, and conversations worth having at home.

  • Writing a family agreement about AIComing soon
  • What never goes into an AI toolComing soon
  • Talking with teenagers about chat companionsComing soon

Direct answers to common questions

What does a biblical worldview say about AI?
Scripture places human beings, made in the image of God, in a category no technology occupies. AI can produce useful work, but truth, moral responsibility, and spiritual authority remain human and divine matters.
How should Christian schools approach AI?
Begin with mission and biblical principles, then set standards for teaching, assessment, privacy, and student use that faculty and families can apply consistently.
How can parents help children use AI safely?
Set age-appropriate boundaries, keep use visible, agree on what personal information is never entered, review tools together, and keep talking as tools change.
Can AI support learning without replacing student thinking?
Yes, when the assignment makes the thinking visible and the student remains responsible for reasoning, sources, and the final work.